Tuesday, December 04, 2007

 

Hillary, the Victim

GM Roper posted on Hillary's meltdown today. He concludes with "How long will it be before she once again dons the mantle of the victim and claims that those mean old men are once again ganging up on her? Why, it gives her the vapors!"

Well, Robin Gerber, senior faculty with the Gallup Organization, is right there claiming Hillary is the victim.
But they're blaming the victim. Clinton is running for president in a sexist culture that persists in seeing strong, capable women as suspect.

It's not that voters and her opponents think Clinton's experienced and competent, and they don't like or trust her. It's that they think she's experienced and competent and that's why they don't like or trust her.
Poor baby. I wonder what she's capable of. Judging from her response to Obama and her history, plenty that we don't want.

"they think she's experienced and competent..." Umm, I doubt it. Her experience is as good or better than her Democratic opponents but pales in comparison to most of the Republicans in the race. Gerber goes on to base much of her argument on a single study that women are "forced to choose between competence and being liked and trusted by their colleagues, but leaders must have both to succeed."

Naturally, all the evidence towards reasonable lack of trust of Hillary is ignored. No mention of the commodities trades, no mention of Whitewater, Travelgate, the FBI background reports (Is that how she got the info on Obama?), etc. What has Hillary done to show she can be trusted? People spoon out trust in small doses. You must earn it.

Indeed, Gerber states:
Is there evidence proving that Hillary Clinton can't be trusted? To quote one of the great presidential debate responses: "No."
Do we live on the same planet? As they say, denial is not a river in Egypt.

Gerber's recommendation?
What's a woman running for president to do? Pull the gender card out of the deck and hold it up high. Most people are unaware of their bias or don't want to recognize or acknowledge it.
And just how aware is Gerber of her bias? Not at all is my guess. Introspection is a beautiful quality, Gerber should try it.

In the mean time, I'm going into the printing business. Victim cards, gender cards, and race cards are selling like hotcakes.

UPDATE: Susan Estrich has some thoughts on Robin Berger's article. I don't completely agree with her but we're close.
Hat tip to Right on the Left Coast.

Comments:
Hillary has not been given a fair shake by the media this whole race, and it's simply incomprehensible. So many people claim to want freedom, but when they get it, they don't know what to do with it.

Vote For Hillary Online
 
This comment has been removed by the author.
 
You are right, VFHO. "So many people" just don't deserve freedom of choice, do they?
 
VFHO - Huh? Believe what you want about the "fair shake" crap, but freedom?
 
oh, come now dadv, isn't this all ironical and stuff? *falls over laughing*
 
Dadvocate, I went to the vfho site. Wow, so that is what a "true believer" sounds like. LOL I truly get a kick out of these folk, they are soooooo clueless. Thanks for the link by the way.
 
Next thing you know, Hillary will be saying, "Don't hate me because I'm beautiful." (Snicker)
 
You are so right, VFHO. Us poor poo-picking hillbillies need the instruction of our betters to tell us what to do/think/eat/drink/smoke/s*it/pee.

Sarcasm off.

Take it from me, Dadvocate, another casualty of the War Against Dads in Ohio (in Kucinichville, no less!)

No matter how bad the legal shizz,

No matter how the feministas poison your kid against you,

No matter the legal threat of child support,

No matter the vagaries of the single life,

You still don't have to go home to Hillary.
 
You still don't have to go home to Hillary.

LOL!
 
I got no further than this:

"We were going to list her positions on this website, but because of how quickly her positions change on each issue, we simply don't have the staff to be able to keep up with all the updates."

You know, you can't make this stuff up. VFHO thinks this is good? And this is a pro-Hillary web site? We need more VFHO clones on the web!
 
br549 - LOL, again!

You may be right about the "pro" Hillary stuff. I wonder if they ever read what they write.
 
Yeo...Long time no talk to!

I thought to leave this here. The most important thing I think that is on the 'hiring' of a new President is the following:

When we look to the candidates, most of us have a vague idea on where these folks ( Democrat or Republican¹) stand on Immigration. Yet is there anything comprehensive we can view to get a 360º view of their positions? Take a look at this site
shown below, as it may assist in your understanding.


http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez2008.html



1. For the record, I am an Independent.
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]