Tuesday, November 06, 2007
How To Decrease Sexual Assault
Yesterday I worked from home and listened to my favorite radio talk show host, Mike McConnell. Yesterday McConnell started off with with the discussing a column in the Chicago Tribune that pornography does not contribute to sexual assaults as many would have you believe. Although pornography is easily available via Internet, etc and "One Nielsen survey found that one out of every four users say they visited adult sites in the last month."
I've always found the feminist position of supporting abortion because "a woman has a right to control her body" but opposing prostitution hypocritical. Why can a person have sex with any number of others and it's perfectly legal until cash is exchanged? Another one of those mysteries of life.
Mike McConnell almost always makes me think. He certainly did this time.
This is part of a broad decrease in criminal mayhem. Since 1993, violent crime in America has dropped by 58 percent. But the progress in this one realm has been especially dramatic. Rape is down 72 percent and other sexual assaults have fallen by 68 percent. Even in the last two years, when the FBI reported upticks in violent crime, the number of rapes continued to fall.these researchers say:
I think it is better to expend our energies in two directions. 1) Make better pornography so that preferred role models are portrayed and more segments of society can come to appreciate or at least understand and tolerate its value23; and 2) turn our research to other directions to eliminate or reduce the social ills of rape and other sex crimes. The best place to look is probably in the home during the first decade of life. But it is only by research that we can continue to understand how to most effectively meet this social challenge. Governments as well as the pornography industry itself would do well to finance and encourage such research.Todd Kendall, professor of economics at Clemson University concludes,
The results above suggest that potential rapists perceive pornography as a substitute for rape. With the mass market introduction of the world wide web in the late-1990’s, both pecuniary and non-pecuniary prices for pornography fell. The associated decline in rape illustrated in the analysis here is consistent with a theory, such as that in Posner (1994), in which pornography is a complement for masturbation or consensual sex, which are themselves substitutes for rape, making pornography a net substitute for rape.Very interesting and it makes some sense. While I'm not crazy about about pornography and have never seen the Paris Hilton or Pamela Anderson tapes, my libertarian leanings say that freely consenting adults creating pornography is to be tolerated.
Given the limitations of the data, policy prescriptions based on these results must be made with extreme care. Nevertheless, the results suggest that, in contrast to previous theories to the contrary, liberalization of pornography access may lead to declines in sexual victimization of women.
I've always found the feminist position of supporting abortion because "a woman has a right to control her body" but opposing prostitution hypocritical. Why can a person have sex with any number of others and it's perfectly legal until cash is exchanged? Another one of those mysteries of life.
Mike McConnell almost always makes me think. He certainly did this time.
Comments:
<< Home
Prostitution is illegal because it is only pay as you go. A hooker is much cheaper than a wife.
Hand bags and high heels on the floor of the closet that rarely to never get used, would buy quite a few rounds. No mother in law to deal with. The advantages, it would seem, far out weigh the disadvantages.
Hand bags and high heels on the floor of the closet that rarely to never get used, would buy quite a few rounds. No mother in law to deal with. The advantages, it would seem, far out weigh the disadvantages.
"pay as you go", I like that.
I guy I once knew what married for 3 months and his ex got $100,000 out of him for it. His comment me about it was that he could have had a $1,000 hooker every night for less.
I guy I once knew what married for 3 months and his ex got $100,000 out of him for it. His comment me about it was that he could have had a $1,000 hooker every night for less.
What truly boggles my mind, and I just can't get my head around it, is this.
No matter what the circumstances, I simply am totally, unequivically in love with my daughters and my son. I can't imagine anything powerful enough to change that. I think that's normal.
But the ex utterly destroyed any and all feelings I had for her at one time. I have no feelings at all. I wouldn't care if she won the lottery, or died in a car crash. No feelings, either way. I have wondered about that.
The dream itself (maybe that's all it truly was) of a family, like the one I was born and raised in was all I ever wanted. It sure ended weird.
No matter what the circumstances, I simply am totally, unequivically in love with my daughters and my son. I can't imagine anything powerful enough to change that. I think that's normal.
But the ex utterly destroyed any and all feelings I had for her at one time. I have no feelings at all. I wouldn't care if she won the lottery, or died in a car crash. No feelings, either way. I have wondered about that.
The dream itself (maybe that's all it truly was) of a family, like the one I was born and raised in was all I ever wanted. It sure ended weird.
No feelings, either way.
Pretty much the same here except that I don't wonder about it. All the positive feelings were killed and I don't want to walk around harboring bad feelings so I repressed to the point that they rarely make a twinge.
Post a Comment
Pretty much the same here except that I don't wonder about it. All the positive feelings were killed and I don't want to walk around harboring bad feelings so I repressed to the point that they rarely make a twinge.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]